Paradoxically, shame operates in two directions. “Our findings suggest that food waste is often narrated through a cycle of social judgement,” said RMIT Associate Lecturer in Professional Communication Nguyen Thi Nam Phuong. “Some people fear being shamed for not providing enough food, while simultaneously shaming others for taking leftovers home.”
The research team pointed out that when food waste is seen as a result of outdated social norms, individuals’ poor manners or moral failure, its wider structural causes might be overlooked. And if food waste is treated mainly as a matter of personal behaviour, systemic solutions may receive less attention.
From individual shaming to shared responsibility
Individuals and households are presented as both the main contributor to food waste and the primary actors expected to solve it. Meanwhile, other actors – including food services and retailers, which together accounted for 40% of food waste globally according to UNEP’s 2024 report – receive less attention. The role of regulators in developing the systems and infrastructure needed to prevent, collect and redistribute surplus food is also less discussed.
“Consumer behaviour matters, but it is not the whole story,” said Dr Lena Bucatariu, RMIT Lecturer in Professional Communication. “Household's food-related decisions can also be influenced by portion sizes, promotions, food labels, redistribution networks and waste-collection infrastructure.”
The research team believes Vietnamese media should therefore move beyond household tips and moral criticism of consumers. Coverage should focus more on other actors, encouraging businesses and authorities to develop system-wide solutions such as measuring and reporting food waste, supporting food-sharing apps and redistribution networks, and investing in infrastructure for separating, collecting and processing food waste.
As Vietnam marks the International Day of Awareness of Food Loss and Waste on 29 September, it is important to recognise that food waste will not be reduced simply by making people feel guilty. A more productive conversation may be one that examines how households, businesses, and policymakers can together change the way food is produced, consumed and discarded.
Story: Lam Luong
Masthead and thumbnail image: Pormezz – stock.adobe.com