Scale and intent do not reduce liability
Dr Vassily V. Kucherenko, lecturer in Professional Communication at RMIT University Vietnam, said that intellectual property violations in affiliate marketing are not mitigated by scale or intent.
“It doesn’t matter, in fact, if it’s a micro-influencer or a global celebrity: you’re exploiting their identity to drive sales and earn commission,” he said.
“Responsibility in affiliate marketing ecosystems is often shared, with brands carrying primary responsibility for setting clear rules and monitoring content, while platforms and affiliates may be liable for negligence or wilful blindness.
“If a small-scale affiliate on Shopee or TikTok Shop uses infringing content to earn commission, the brand may still be implicitly responsible if it failed to monitor or terminate bad actors, which can lead to significant reputational damage.”
Plagiarism often disguised as “inspiration”
The issue extends beyond images and branding to content plagiarism, where copying is often framed as “inspiration”. Dr Nguyen Thi Tham, lecturer in Professional Communication at RMIT University Vietnam, said digital plagiarism occurs when someone copies content without attribution, and theft occurs when content is used without permission or in breach of copyright rules or platform terms.
Key factors include whether attribution or consent was provided, how much of the original content was taken, whether the use was commercial, and whether platform rules or intellectual property laws were breached.
“Technical evidence such as metadata and timestamps can also play an important role,” she said.
“It’s worth noting that current intellectual property laws still contain gaps, particularly in addressing new and cross-border forms of digital infringement.”
Dr Kucherenko offered a practical rule of thumb for identifying plagiarism in online content: “If removing the original creator’s name doesn’t change the value of the post, it’s stolen.”
“Copying a competitor’s video script or infographic layout with minimal changes does not amount to creative transformation. That’s not ‘inspired by’ – that’s a clear ‘rip-off’,” he said.