One example is the recent response of a large food company, after its exported products were flagged for containing banned substances. Immediately upon receiving the information from European authorities, the company launched an investigation, held a press conference, and affirmed that its domestic products were safe. Transparency and collaboration with the media and the authorities helped the business mitigate damage, manage the crisis effectively, and reaffirm its commitment to quality.
Practical lessons and strategies for managing food safety crises
Vietnam businesses that handle food safety crises well all have something in common: swift responses and transparency. Identifying the source of the incident and responding promptly via a Facebook post or a TikTok video are key factors to controlling the situation. Specific responses such as a public apology, refund, and operational suspension of a brand for internal investigation not only reassure the public but also expresses responsibility. Some businesses even promote their apologies as a commitment to transparency, thereby regaining the goodwill of customers.
A crisis is also a test of corporate culture and internal strength. A brand can weather a media storm if it possesses an effective collaboration system among the executive team, communications, and legal departments. In any situation, silence or denial of responsibility is the most damaging response. Listening to customers’ feedback, working closely with authorities, and proactively communicating with control are measures to make a crisis an opportunity to assure the core values of the brand.
In communication, businesses need to publish their responses on the platforms when the incident occurs, including comments, correction articles and explanatory livestreams. Allowing negative information to linger unanswered is the minimum principle for maintaining public trust. Crisis messages must be transparent, clear, and consistent across all channels. Apologies should include specific actions such as process improvements, production quality enhancements, staff training, and refunds – these are the most persuasive ways to restore a company’s image.
Finally, crisis management cannot stop at communication. Businesses need to conduct comprehensive reviews of their supply chains, adjust production or service processes, and even change suppliers if necessary. Applying technology such as AI or social listening tools can detect the early warning signs of a crisis and enable timely responses. Substantive actions are the clearest evidence of a commitment to improvement, laying a solid foundation for the brand to recover and develop sustainably.
Story: Dr Bui Quoc Liem, Lecturer in Professional Communication, RMIT Vietnam