Pedestrian infrastructure in the city is widespread but often narrow, uneven, and disconnected. There is almost no dedicated cycling infrastructure, and public transport consists mainly of buses with limited rail options.
“If planners and engineers can set a good metropolitan transport strategy, then residents should also have more choices as to how they travel – from easier local walking trips on improved footpaths, to more convenient and seamless travel across the city thanks to fast, frequent, and integrated bus and metro networks,” he says.
He points out that those who want to own private cars may choose to do so but will likely need to pay more for the impacts that this travel mode imposes.
“Limiting the growth of private cars is essential, as these are the least efficient means of travel within large, dense cities. Electric cars still take up the same space as conventional cars, and still produce adverse emissions such as brake and tyre particulates,” he says.
“Limiting the number of private passenger cars means more of the existing road space is available for freight and commercial vehicles that are directly contributing to city productivity and economic development, though these vehicles also need to contribute to the cost of using roads.”
Commenting on the big picture, Dr Kanagasapapathy suggests that HCMC should lead the transition with flexible, community-led models. It can serve as a testing ground for policies that blend environmental goals with economic realities, particularly for low-income and informal workers.
“If Vietnam is to meet its climate commitments, the biggest cities must move in tandem. HCMC’s scale and complexity show how a megacity can go green without leaving anyone behind,” she says. “The transition won’t be easy, but the cost of inaction is far greater.”
Story: Ngoc Hoang and Trang Dinh