Can generative AI and critical thinking coexist?

Can generative AI and critical thinking coexist?

As generative AI reshapes education, a key challenge emerges: Can it enhance learning without weakening critical thinking? The answer lies in how we teach students to engage with AI thoughtfully.

Generative AI (GenAI) technologies such as ChatGPT are making a transformative impact on the Vietnamese educational sector. 

According to RMIT Vietnam Associate Professor Agnis Stibe, while these AI tools are celebrated for their ability to provide personalised learning experiences and immediate access to information, they also bring a big challenge: The ease of access might lead to an over-reliance on AI for problem-solving and idea generation, potentially stifling student creativity and critical thinking.  

“Developing critical thinking skills is a fundamental goal of education,” he says. “While allowing students to leverage the benefits of generative AI, educators must ensure the intellectual development of students is not compromised.” 

Furthermore, Dr Anushka Siriwardana, a lecturer in Digital Marketing at RMIT, warns that overusing GenAI can foster a 'know-it-all' attitude among students. They become accustomed to receiving immediate answers but are not motivated to engage deeply with complex problems or develop their own reasoned arguments. 

This raises a crucial challenge: How can AI be used to support, rather than replace, critical thinking? 

RMIT students learning at laptopsDeveloping critical thinking skills is a fundamental goal of education. (Photo: RMIT)

Recent RMIT research highlights a key factor in the moderating effects of age and education on how students can relate to AI technologies. 

In the Vietnamese context, students with higher educational attainment may demonstrate a more effective integration of AI into their learning processes, as they are likely to approach these tools with a critical mindset. 

Associate Professor Stibe says, “While older and more educated students might leverage AI to enhance their understanding and engage in deeper analysis, younger students may rely on AI for quick answers, potentially hindering their critical thinking ability.” 

As Vietnamese educational institutions navigate the integration of AI, the RMIT academics believe it is crucial to consider these moderating effects. Tailoring educational strategies that foster critical thinking while accommodating diverse age groups and educational backgrounds will be essential.  

“By promoting a culture of enquiry and encouraging students to question AI-generated information, educators can better equip them to engage thoughtfully with technology, ultimately enhancing their critical thinking capabilities in an AI-augmented learning environment,” Dr Siriwardana says. 

(L-R) Associate Professor Agnis Stibe and Dr Anushka Siriwardana (L-R) Associate Professor Agnis Stibe and Dr Anushka Siriwardana

Associate Professor Stibe suggests that one practical way to foster critical thinking in students is to design exercises that require them to develop effective prompting skills when using GenAI tools. The ultimate goal is for students to achieve fewer prompts per issue while still obtaining relevant and innovative information.  

For example, in a Digital Marketing class at RMIT, students might be tasked with exploring the latest AI-driven marketing innovations. They could begin by prompting GenAI with a broad question like, "What are the newest trends in AI-driven marketing?" 

From there, instead of continually asking vague follow-up questions, students can refine their prompts to be more specific, such as, "How are AI tools being used to personalise customer experiences in digital marketing?" 

This approach encourages them to think critically about their enquiries and the nuances of the information they seek. By engaging in this exercise, students not only learn to interact more effectively with AI but also develop the ability to analyse and prioritise information, ultimately enhancing their critical thinking skills. 

“Striking the right balance between AI and critical thinking is key. By teaching students to question, refine, and analyse AI-generated content, educators can turn GenAI into an effective tool for deeper learning and critical thinking rather than a crutch," says Associate Professor Stibe.

 

Thumbnail image: Vitalii Vodolazskyi – stock.adobe.com | Masthead image: Have a nice day – stock.adobe.com

14 March 2025
Engage

Related news

Sora app

Sora is dead. AI slop is not.
Media Release
Icon / Small / CalendarCreated with Sketch. 06 Apr 2026

OpenAI has closed its video generation app Sora. RMIT academic Christian Berg argues that while one expensive tool has disappeared, the machinery that produces and rewards AI-generated junk content is still accelerating.

Ride-hailing delivery drivers

Can apps care? Rethinking wellbeing for Vietnam’s ride-hailing workers
Media Release
Icon / Small / CalendarCreated with Sketch. 06 Apr 2026

RMIT lecturer Dr Divya Juneja explores the mental health costs of ride-hailing work in Vietnam and asks whether digital platforms can redesign their algorithms to better support worker wellbeing.

scam call alert on a smartphone

RMIT expert calls for tougher tech response to scam threats
Media Release
Icon / Small / CalendarCreated with Sketch. 17 Mar 2026

Recent crackdowns on scam compounds across Southeast Asia highlight the need for stronger technology‑based safeguards and collaboration, according to RMIT cyber security expert Dr Joshua Dwight.

Green digital brain

The right to be forgotten: Building trust in the AI future
Media Release
Icon / Small / CalendarCreated with Sketch. 19 Sep 2025

When AI remembers what it shouldn’t, privacy is at risk. RMIT Senior Lecturer in Computer Science Dr James Kang explores how we could train AI to forget and rebuild public trust.

Load more +